Funded Projects

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

The growing opioid use epidemic in the U.S. has been associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of pregnant opioid-dependent women and neonatal abstinence syndrome, which is associated with adverse health effects for the infant and with costly hospitalizations. Maintenance with sublingual (SL) buprenorphine (BUP) is efficacious for opioid use disorder but has disadvantages that may be heightened in pregnant women, including the potential for poor adherence, treatment dropout, and negative maternal/fetal effects associated with daily BUP peak-trough cycles. Extended release (XR) formulations may address some of these disadvantages. The primary objective of CTN-0080 is to evaluate the impact of treating opioid use disorder in pregnant women (n = 300) with BUP-XR, compared to BUP-SL, on maternal-infant outcomes. Other objectives include testing a conceptual model of the mechanisms by which BUP-XR may improve maternal-infant outcomes, relative to BUP-SL; determining the economic value of BUP-XR, compared with BUP-SL, to treat OUD in pregnant women; and evaluating the impact of BUP-XR, relative to BUP-SL, on neurodevelopment when the infant/child is approximately 12 and 24 months of age. Ultimately, this study will help in increasing access to treatment as well as provide quality care for pregnant/postpartum women.

Hospital inpatient stays due to opioid-related health problems are a reachable moment for increasing access to treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) are at particularly high risk for morbidity, mortality, and high medical costs in the U.S. This study will substantially inform the care management of OUD in hospitalized patients. The project includes a comparative effectiveness research trial and an implementation research trial, which will lead to models of broad dissemination for treatment approaches to this largely unaddressed population. They will examine whether (1) in hospitals with addiction medicine consultation services, hospital-initiated extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP), compared with other OUD medications, results in increased engagement in treatment with MOUD following hospital discharge and (2) training hospitals without such consultation services on best practices for initiating MOUD using consultation service hubs improves medication uptake in hospitals and increased MOUD treatment engagement following discharge.

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

For many reasons, the emergency department (ED) is a critical venue to initiate opioid use disorder (OUD) interventions. ED patients have a disproportionately high prevalence of substance use disorders and are at an elevated risk of overdose, and many do not access health care elsewhere. Despite this, OUD interventions are rarely initiated in EDs. The Emergency Department Connection to Care with Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder study (CTN-0079) will assess the feasibility, acceptability and impact of introducing clinical protocols for screening for OUD, buprenorphine treatment initiation, and referral for ongoing treatment in ED settings with high need, limited resources and different staffing structures. This extension study will use the existing infrastructure to evaluate the adoption and sustainability of the clinical protocols introduced at each of the study sites and to identify factors influencing their diffusion and effectiveness.

Community pharmacies are optimal—yet underutilized—settings for identifying individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) and increasing their access to treatment. Approximately 93 percent of individuals in the U.S. live within 5 miles of a community pharmacy. The most common opioid-related tool available to pharmacists is the prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP), which provides highly limited information and support for clinical decision making. Appriss Health, the largest U.S. PDMP vendor, covering 42 states, has developed an opioid risk measure, the NarxScore. This study will clinically validate the NarxScore metric and identify high, moderate and low opioid risk thresholds to inform OUD care management within urban and rural community pharmacies. This is a prospective cross-sectional comprehensive OUD risk and behavioral/physical health survey administered electronically with patients (n = 1,523) filling opioid medications in urban/rural community pharmacies in Ohio (pharmacy sites: n = 12) and Indiana (pharmacy sites: n = 3), states that continue to have disproportionately high rates of overdose and opioid prescribing. Correlation, regression and kappa statistics will be calculated for validation; receiver operating curves with sensitivity/specificity values will be employed for threshold identification (with >95 percent power to detect an area of 0.7 under the curve value).

Community pharmacies are optimal—yet underutilized—settings for identifying individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) and increasing their access to treatment. Approximately 93 percent of individuals in the U.S. live within 5 miles of a community pharmacy. The most common opioid-related tool available to pharmacists is the prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP), which provides highly limited information and support for clinical decision making. Appriss Health, the largest U.S. PDMP vendor, covering 42 states, has developed an opioid risk measure, the NarxScore. This study will clinically validate the NarxScore metric and identify high, moderate and low opioid risk thresholds to inform OUD care management within urban and rural community pharmacies. This is a prospective cross-sectional comprehensive OUD risk and behavioral/physical health survey administered electronically with patients (n = 1,523) filling opioid medications in urban/rural community pharmacies in Ohio (pharmacy sites: n = 12) and Indiana (pharmacy sites: n = 3), states that continue to have disproportionately high rates of overdose and opioid prescribing. Correlation, regression and kappa statistics will be calculated for validation; receiver operating curves with sensitivity/specificity values will be employed for threshold identification (with >95 percent power to detect an area of 0.7 under the curve value).

The growing opioid use epidemic in the U.S. has been associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of pregnant opioid-dependent women and neonatal abstinence syndrome, which is associated with adverse health effects for the infant and with costly hospitalizations. Maintenance with sublingual (SL) buprenorphine (BUP) is efficacious for opioid use disorder but has disadvantages that may be heightened in pregnant women, including the potential for poor adherence, treatment dropout, and negative maternal/fetal effects associated with daily BUP peak-trough cycles. Extended release (XR) formulations may address some of these disadvantages. The primary objective of CTN-0080 is to evaluate the impact of treating opioid use disorder in pregnant women (n = 300) with BUP-XR, compared to BUP-SL, on maternal-infant outcomes. Other objectives include testing a conceptual model of the mechanisms by which BUP-XR may improve maternal-infant outcomes, relative to BUP-SL; determining the economic value of BUP-XR, compared with BUP-SL, to treat OUD in pregnant women; and evaluating the impact of BUP-XR, relative to BUP-SL, on neurodevelopment when the infant/child is approximately 12 and 24 months of age. Ultimately, this study will help in increasing access to treatment as well as provide quality care for pregnant/postpartum women.

The opioid crisis continues its highly negative impact, with more than 49,000 opioid-related overdose deaths in 2017. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued guidelines for opioid prescribing that included opioid dosing and risk mitigation strategies, and health systems implemented similar initiatives even earlier. This has resulted in a quickly changing and more conservative prescribing environment. National data indicate the number of prescriptions has fallen between 2013 and 2016. Registries and electronic health record (EHR) data are increasingly cited as valuable resources to address critical research questions on opioid use with high efficiency. To our knowledge, no investigators have established an EHR-based prescription opioid registry across several diverse health systems with common data algorithms with the flexibility to address multiple questions. The goal of the proposed research is to develop a prescription opioid registry across 10 diverse health systems with harmonized EHR data from years 2012-2018 and leverage it to answer several key “next-step” research questions in response to the opioid crisis. The registry will include medications prescribed for treatment of OUD, including buprenorphine products.

This study seeks to address the priority of the optimal duration of buprenorphine treatment to reduce the risk of relapse, overdose and mortality outcomes using observational data. Answering this question with a randomized trial raises ethical concerns. Observational studies with large datasets can address these important questions relatively quickly. At the same time, observational studies pose their own methodologic challenges related to confounding, misclassification of exposure and outcome, and informative loss to follow-up. This study will identify and quantify the potential for these sources of bias and then conduct analyses to address the questions of interest (risk of relapse, overdose and mortality).

Effective treatment for OUD has been shown to improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs; however, evidence of this effect in primary care settings is severely limited. The health economic findings from this study will supplement the parent PROUD trial’s results regarding clinical effectiveness and implementation outcomes and provide critical contextual information for health systems and other health care stakeholders. The study will evaluate the economic viability of the PROUD collaborative care model for OUD—that is, from the perspective of the health care sector, to what extent do the downstream cost savings associated with improved patient outcomes offset the additional costs of the PROUD intervention? The specific aims are to (1) estimate the start-up and ongoing management costs of the PROUD intervention, (2) assess costs associated with health care utilization for patients who receive primary care treatment in PROUD and usual care clinics and have been identified with recognized OUDs before clinic randomization, and (3) estimate the economic value of the PROUD intervention, measured as net monetary benefit (NMB, incremental benefit minus incremental cost), from the health care sector perspective.

Very little research has been conducted on better understanding of phenotypic characterization of individuals with OUD (beyond DSM-5 diagnoses) and how these features predict illness severity, treatment retention or outcomes. The primary objective of the deep phenotyping study is to provide a comprehensive phenotypic characterization (e.g., domains of negative affect, reward salience, cognitive control, mental health) of a heterogeneous sample of individuals (n = 1,000) who currently meet one or more DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for OUD and are in treatment for OUD. In a subset of this sample (n = 100), the investigators conduct digital phenotyping to examine the utility of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), digital sensing and social media to predict retention, medication adherence and opioid use outcomes in patients receiving buprenorphine for OUD. It is anticipated that this foundational study will inform the feasibility and utility of such assessments that can be successfully embedded into imminent and future CTN and other OUD clinical trials.

This proposal would address barriers to the NP’s ability to prescribe buprenorphine by incorporating waiver education into NP final semester curriculum. The initial eight hours of training would be provided to students in a face-to-face classroom setting or via live video streaming. The remaining 16 hours would be completed by the NP students through online modules offered by the AANP. Trained NP students would be eligible for one year of peer-to-peer mentorship and inclusion in the MUSC Project ECHO tele-mentoring for new providers. Outcomes to be tracked would be the number of NPs trained who obtain their waiver and the number of individuals treated with MOUD by the NPs trained. Secondary data collected would offer insight into wavier obtainment process and determine need for mentorship for newly waivered providers.